Synthesis and characterization of organotin complexes with various axial ligands, highlighting chelating effects.
A series of organotin(IV) complexes featuring the pro‐ligand 2,6‐diacetylpyridine bis(2‐methylbenzoylhydrazone) (H 2 L Me ) and various axial ligands have been synthesized. The reactions of H 2 L Me with R 2 SnO (where R = Me, n ‐Bu, n ‐Oct, or t ‐Bu) and n‐ BuSnCl 3 in anhydrous toluene yielded the seven‐coordinate complexes [Me 2 Sn(L Me )] ( 1 ), [ n ‐Bu 2 Sn(L Me )] ( 2 ), [ n ‐Oct 2 Sn(L Me )] ( 3 ), [ t ‐Bu 2 Sn(L Me )] ( 4 ), and [ n ‐BuSn(L Me )Cl] ( 5 ), respectively. Subsequent treatment of complex 5 with NaN 3 and NH 4 SCN afforded the corresponding isothiocyanate and azide derivatives, [ n ‐BuSn(L Me )N 3 ] ( 6 ), and [ n ‐BuSn(L Me )NCS] ( 7 ), respectively. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction studies confirmed that the tin centers in complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , and 7 adopt a seven‐coordinate geometry with a pentagonal bipyramidal configuration. The κ‐ N 3 O 2 donor set of the ligand occupies the equatorial plane, while the axial positions are occupied by either two R groups, or one R group and one Cl, N 3 , or NCS ligand, depending on the specific complex. In addition to X‐ray diffraction analysis, all complexes 1 − 7 are characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, high‐resolution mass spectrometry , and solution‐state Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The structural distortion within the SnN 3 O 2 equatorial plane, attributed to positional shifts of the Sn(IV) center, are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baul et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: