Background: There has been a reduction in successful H. pylori eradication rates recently, which is largely attributed to increasing antibiotic resistance. In areas of high dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance such as ours, Maastricht VI/Florence guidelines recommend bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) as first line of therapy; however, the availability of bismuth was poor in Ireland until recently. Similarly, tetracycline, a component of BQT, is restricted locally, with doxycycline (D) being approved and reimbursed for most indications. Aims: To assess the efficacy of BQT-D therapy for H. pylori eradication in an Irish cohort. Methods: All patients testing positive for H. pylori in three Irish referral centres by urea breath test, stool antigen, or histology were treated prospectively with BQT-D (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg QDS, metronidazole 400 mg TDS, doxycycline 100 mg BD and esomeprazole 40 mg BD) for 14 days. Eradication was evaluated with a urea breath test (UBT) >4 weeks after therapy cessation or by stool antigen testing, as available. Outcomes were recorded and analysed according to demographics and H. pylori treatment history of the patients. Results: 217 patients completed post-eradication testing. Of which, 124 (57%) were female, with a mean age 52 years. 180 patients (83%) were treatment-naïve. A total of 165/180 (92%) of the treatment-naïve patients had successful eradication. There was no association between eradication and gender or age in this cohort (p = 0.3091, p = 0.962 respectively). A total of 29 patients received this therapy as second-line therapy, of which 22 (76%) had successful eradication. Eight patients received the regimen as rescue therapy, with seven (88%) having successful eradication. No serious adverse events were reported. Eleven individuals (6.5%) commented on the complicated nature of the regimen, with 11 tablets being taken at five intervals daily. Conclusions: BQT-D as first-line therapy for H. pylori infection is highly effective in a high dual-resistance population, achieving >90% eradication. BQT-D as a second-line treatment performed less well. Our data support BQT-D as a first-line treatment.
Costigan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.