Field and greenhouse trials demonstrate seed treatments can reduce disease severity in soybean, suggesting effective management options for sudden death syndrome.
Sudden death syndrome (SDS) of soybean, caused by Fusarium virguliforme, can significantly reduce soybean yield and is spreading in North America. Soybean cultivars with partial resistance are important for managing SDS and seed treatments have been developed to supplement resistance and manage SDS where resistance is unavailable. Studies were conducted from 2020-2022 at two field locations in Minnesota to evaluate seed treatments containing fluopyram, pydiflumetofen, and a biological seed treatment containing saponin extract from C. quinoa for managing SDS. Both locations had low soybean cyst nematode populations. Average SDS foliar disease index (FDX) severity was 50% and 19% in the untreated plots at Rosemount and Waseca, Minnesota field locations, respectively. Pydiflumetofen and fluopyram treatments significantly reduced FDX compared to untreated controls on susceptible and partially resistant soybean cultivars and at each field location. Pydiflumetofen significantly reduced FDX in 75% and fluopyram in 62% of the studies by cultivar. Yield was significantly greater with pydiflumetofen than other treatments with both cultivars and significantly greater with fluopyram with one cultivar in Rosemount where SDS severity was greatest. None of the treatments provided a significant yield benefit in Waseca where SDS levels were moderately low. Neither seed treatment nor cultivar significantly influenced plant population. In greenhouse experiments with the same treatments, fluopyram, pydiflumetofen, and saponin extract significantly reduced SDS development compared to controls. In summary, seed treatments can be effective for managing soybean SDS across a range of northern field and greenhouse environments with low SCN populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malvick et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: