Retrospective cohort study identifies inflammatory metabolic index and metabolic-inflammatory stress index as valuable biomarkers for appendicitis, suggesting improved diagnostic accuracy.
Background: Acute appendicitis is a common emergency requiring abdominal surgery. Despite its prevalence, there are no specific biomarkers for its diagnosis and prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the basic laboratory tests of patients with acute appendicitis and to evaluate and integrate biochemical variables into the diagnosis of appendicitis. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study that included data from patients who underwent an appendectomy. Two groups of patients were considered based on their surgical (non-complicated/complicated appendicitis) or pathological diagnosis (non-perforated/perforated appendicitis). Factor analysis was carried out to identify communalities to put forward classificatory indices. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the accuracy of the predictions. Results: The cohort included 246 patients (51.6% male, mean age: 24.79 ± 19.32 years). By using their biochemical data, we generated 6 new indices whose areas under the ROC curve (AUC) ranged between 0.632 and 0.762 for complicated appendicitis and from 0.597 to 0.742 for perforated appendicitis. Inflammatory Metabolic Index (IMI) at the fixed cutoffs was a promising biomarker for both histopathological and surgical diagnoses with odds ratios (OR) of 10.45 and 5.21, respectively. The Metabolic-Inflammatory Stress Index (MISI) showed high specificity (over 72%) and significant AUC values for both diagnoses (0.742 and 0.676). These findings were reinforced by significant p-values and Youden indices. Conclusions: IMI and MISI were demonstrated to be effective biomarkers for complicated and perforated appendicitis. IMI provides predictive capability, while MISI offers specificity and significant AUC values for both histopathological and surgical diagnoses. Incorporating these biomarkers could enhance the accuracy of appendicitis diagnosis and potentially guide clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zorrilla-Alfaro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: