This analysis reveals significant differences between God and Insān Al-Kāmil, highlighting pantheism and platonism influences.
Ibn ᶜArabi's thought is said to unite God with Insān Al-Kāmil. The problem of the study is due to this thinking which is the influence of Greek Platonism, Pantheism, Ḣulūl Shia Ismai'iliyyah and Ittiḣād Bathiniyyah which equates God with Insān Al-Kāmil. So the objective of this study is to try to identify the difference between God and Insān Al-Kāmil. The scope of this study examines the divine and human aspects of his text. Research methodology by collecting data from his essays and analyzing the content. The results of the study found that God by his side conforms to the Creed of Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama'ah Al-Asyairah. There is even a very significant distinction between God and Insān Al-Kāmil. The results of the analysis found that the concept of Insān Al-Kāmil is a creature of God who achieves noble qualities as a manifestation of God's reflection in this world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajudin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: