Analysis reveals distinct survival outcomes in breast cancer patients, indicating the role of metabolic factors and transcription factors.
Background: Breast carcinoma continues to be a predominant factor contributing to cancer-associated mortality in women across the globe. Despite the significant advancements in medical technology today, there remain challenges in accurately stratifying patients based on their risk profiles and identifying the most effective treatment strategies for breast cancer. The regulation of metabolism and transcription factors is considered to have a close association with cancer progression. Objective: Objective: In this study, the co-expression network was utilized to identify transcription factors associated with metabolic molecule subtypes, and ultimately, a risk scoring model was constructed. The two groups of patients demonstrated markedly different clinical outcomes. Method: The ssGSEA is utilized for the enrichment of metabolic pathways. Additionally, WGCNA is employed to explore related transcription factor modules, and the VIPER method is used to infer the state of transcription factors. A machine learning methodology SVM has been employed to model patient survival outcomes. Result: We found that patients with lower risk scores exhibit extended survival durations and chemotherapy response in comparison to their high-risk counterparts. Meanwhile, high-risk patients exhibited higher levels of chromosomal instability and tumor immunogenicity relative to low-risk patients. In addition, we constructed a ceRNA network and successfully identified 39 master regulators associated with survival. Conclusion: We achieved risk stratification of breast cancer patients and accurately predicted their prognosis. Additionally, based on the differences observed between the two subgroups, the result highlighted various contributors impacting the clinical prognosis of breast cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: