Conventional vs. Digital Impressions: Preferences and Comfort Level among Prosthodontic Patients

Introduction Digital impression techniques have gained popularity due to enhanced patient comfort and workflow efficiency. However, conventional methods remain common in many Saudi institutions. This study aimed to compare patient-reported comfort and preference between digital and conventional impressions in prosthodontic treatment in Almadinah Almunawarah, Saudi Arabia. Methods A retrospective, within-subject study was conducted on 100 prosthodontic patients who experienced both digital and conventional impressions. A validated 14-item self-administered questionnaire was used to assess comfort and preference. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and ANOVA were performed using SPSS Version 26 ( p < 0.05). Results Digital impressions were significantly more comfortable than conventional impressions across multiple domains, including gag reflex, breathing difficulty, and time perception ( p < 0.001). Overall, 84% of patients preferred digital impressions. Gender, age, and arch location had no significant influence on preference. Discussion Digital impression was the preferred impression technique among patients who received prosthodontic treatments, due to a more comfortable and pleasant experience, compared to conventional impression making procedure. Conclusion Investing in digital impression and digital workflow is highly recommended to improve patients' experience during prosthodontic procedures.