This article examines the evolution of the Korean standard nuclear power plant concept, highlighting its shift from a flawed adaptation of foreign standards to a symbol of national pride and technological self-reliance.
This article examines how Korean nuclear technocrats formulated the concept of the “Korean standard” nuclear power plant in the 1980s and how its meaning shifted from a compromise to a symbol of national pride through the material realization of the Yeonggwang Units 3 and 4 construction projects. Initially seen as a flaw created by the active modification and adaptation of foreign standards within Korea’s limited technological environment, this concept was redefined as a creative transformation of foreign technologies through the actual construction of the plants by the 1990s. This shift, toward viewing the Korean standard reactor as a flawless achievement embodying Korea’s technological self-reliance, laid the foundation for a fervent techno-nationalist belief in the technological excellence and export potential of Korean-style reactors. By analyzing technical papers and reports written by Korean nuclear technocrats, this article highlights how the techno-nationalism, epitomized by the Korean standard, was reinforced through policy initiatives and material practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Y.D. Park (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: