Observational analysis identified locomotive syndrome in 88.1% of perioperative patients with localized cancer, suggesting age and grip strength as key risk factors.
Introduction Many patients with cancer experience reduced activities of daily living due to muscle weakness and fatigue caused by underlying symptoms and treatment side effects. However, the incidence of locomotive syndrome, which may reduce mobility due to motor dysfunction in patients with cancer, has not been sufficiently explored. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence of locomotive syndrome and identify its risk factors in perioperative patients with cancer. Methods We included 636 perioperative patients with localized cancer who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The severity of locomotive syndrome was classified into stages 1, 2, and 3. Results The overall locomotive syndrome rate was 88.1%, with distribution across stages: stage 1 (56.8%), stage 2 (17.5%), and stage 3 (13.8%). Among men, the overall incidence was 86.5%, with stage 1 (60.3%), stage 2 (15.5%), and stage 3 (10.7%). Among women, the overall incidence was 90.6%, with stage 1 (50.6%), stage 2 (20.9%), and stage 3 (19.1%). Half of patients in their 20s and two-thirds in their 30s had locomotive syndrome. The rates were 58.6%, 80.4%, 81.8%, 93.2%, and 97.8% in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s age groups, respectively. Individuals in their 40s had significantly lower rates than those in older groups. Age, grip strength, and percent vital capacity were identified as risk factors. Conclusion A high prevalence of locomotive syndrome was observed among patients with localized cancer. Age, reduced grip strength, and lower respiratory capacity were identified as associated factors. While the findings suggest possible implications for postoperative recovery, further validation through longitudinal studies is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katayama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: