This tool improves sampling efficiency in bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews, indicating enhanced relevance classification.
This paper presents a novel interactive tool for sampling papers in bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews, integrating keyword frequency analysis and semantic similarity ranking. Built using R Shiny, the application enables researchers to prioritize academic abstracts through a dual-method approach systematically: Term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) weighted keyword matching, and Cosine similarity-based semantic alignment with user-defined queries. A dynamic weighting mechanism enhances the hybrid approach, outperforming traditional methods by balancing lexical precision with contextual depth. The tool addresses critical challenges in quantitative literature review processes by introducing data-driven thresholding with three-tier prioritisation (green/orange/red categories) and export functionalities. In test cases, the hybrid approach classified 2.29 % of papers as highly relevant using keyword analysis and 1.47 % using semantic similarity on an AI in libraries dataset, with broader coverage (58.45% moderately relevant) in hybrid mode, demonstrating its ability to identify contextually aligned works efficiently. Technical implementation details, mathematical foundations, and applications are discussed. The tool supports extracting relevant papers from a dataset drawn from Web of Science, Scopus, OpenAlex, and Dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayank Yuvaraj (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: