This study examines how thermal treatment impacts screw-in force and canal-centering ability in rotary instruments under varying downward loads.
This study aimed to examine how downward load applied during instrumentation affects the stress generation and shaping properties in thermally treated and non-treated NiTi rotary instruments. ProTaper Universal (PTU; non-thermally treated) and ProTaper Gold (PTG; thermally treated) were used to prepare J-shaped canals in resin blocks. Load-controlled automated instrumentation and torque/force sensing devices were employed with preset downward loads of 1, 2, or 3 N (n = 10 each). The torque/force, instrumentation time, and canal-centering ratio were measured and analyzed using two-way or one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). In the PTU-1N group, instrumentation was not completed because a ledge was formed in all canals. The PTU-3N group showed significantly greater upward force (screw-in force) and clockwise torque, along with a significantly smaller canal-centering ratio (less deviation) at the apical 0 mm level, than the PTU-2N group (p < 0.05). The downward load did not influence the instrumentation time (p > 0.05). In the PTG groups, these effects of downward load on the force generation and canal-centering ratio were not significant (p > 0.05). In the non-thermally treated PTU instruments, greater downward loads enhanced screw-in force while decreasing apical canal deviation; however, these effects were abolished in the thermally treated PTG instruments. This study highlights the importance of adapting the instrumentation technique with instrument characteristics: thermally treated flexible instruments facilitate smoother use, while stiffer, non-thermally treated ones may require precise control of downward loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: