Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025BMJ OpenOpen Access

Prioritising methodological research questions for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps for health research: a protocol for PROSPECT Delphi study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DPDanielle PollockSHSabira HasanoffGMGrace McKenzie McBride

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Delphi study prioritizes research questions for scoping reviews and mapping reviews, indicating clear methodological gaps in health research.

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify and prioritize research questions addressing methodological uncertainties in big picture reviews.
  • Participants will include patients, clinicians, and researchers, contributing to the development of a strategic research agenda.
  • A modified e-Delphi process will gather insights through surveys and workshops to refine priorities for these reviews.
  • The findings will inform policy development and guideline creation, supporting evidence-based health practices.

Cite This Study

Pollock et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b18554b1d3bfb60e852dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096298
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A scoping review of scoping reviews in healthcare simulation: a research protocol2025
  2. 2Research and Scholarly Methods: Scoping Reviews2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3A Structured Approach to Involve Stakeholders in Prioritising Topics for Systematic Reviews in Public Health2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Defining precision health: a scoping review protocol2021 · 33 citations
  5. 5Exploring Discrepancies between Protocols and Published Scoping Reviews in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Methodological Study2025