This analysis compares hate speech regulations in Brazil and the U.S., highlighting jurisdictional differences and implications for international human rights.
The present contribution analyzes in a functionalist comparative method the criteria utilized by the Brazilian and American jurisdiction to limit free speech. By focusing on the issue of 'hate speech', the author examines two landmark cases in each jurisdiction. After individually assessing each domestic constitutional doctrine, the findings are evaluated by the interpretation of the lnter American System of Human Rights and the Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination, ruling bodies of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Men and of the lnternational Convention on the Elimination of AII Forms of Racial Discrimination. The normative assessment concludes with the identification of the Brazilian jurisdiction as containing the most accepted interpretation on the llmitation of free speech in hate speech cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlos Gabriel Ramaglia Mota (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: