This review discusses key themes in meeting science and identifies future research directions, highlighting employee voice and organizational dynamics.
This review examines the development and evolution of meeting science over the past three decades. Drawing on diverse disciplinary foundations—including the organizational sciences, communication studies, and computer science—we provide a thematic discussion of meetings research. We organize the body of literature into five key areas of inquiry: ( a ) meetings as stressors and affective inducing events; ( b ) meetings as a communication technology that drives performance; ( c ) meetings as a platform for employee voice, participation, and inclusion; ( d ) meetings as a stage for leadership and power dynamics; and ( e ) meetings as an expression of culture and identity. We present illustrative findings from each research stream and conclude by outlining a research agenda that addresses how to build upon what we know around meetings as well as new frontiers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogelberg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: