This research demonstrates the impact of ecology and geometry on integration levels in social spiders, suggesting evolutionary implications.
In the origin of multicellular organisms or social groups, a dichotomy emerges between systems where the parts retain some autonomy, referred to as modular, and more integrated unitarian systems. I explore the critical roles of ecology and geometry in determining whether groups form and the degree of integration they develop. I argue that these are essential considerations above and beyond whether groups originate from a single cell or single inseminated female. I consider these points through the lens of social and colonial spiders, which represent early transitions to either unitarian or modular systems. By allowing or constraining cooperation, I suggest that the geometry of their webs—irregular tridimensional versus orbicular—determines the degree of integration of their groups, their scaling properties, their population structure, and their long-term evolutionary fate. Ecology, on the other hand, determines the need or opportunity for groups to form. I extend these lessons to other social systems and levels of organization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leticia Avilés (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: