Prospective study assessed femoral malrotation risks post-trochanteric fracture repair, indicating dangers of excessive limb rotation.
Introduction Improper closed trochanteric fracture reduction can cause rotational malposition which can lead to serious consequences. The primary objective of this study was to assess the hypothetical threshold at which excessive rotation becomes hazardous due to a significant postoperative malrotation. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective study focused on closed reduction in intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures (AO 31A1-3) in 100 consecutive patients and its influence on final malrotation. Immediately after the closed reduction, the rotation of affected limb was measured using a balanced goniometer and the values were compared to the postoperative CT calculation. Final femoral malrotation exceeding 15° was considered significant. All results were statistically analyzed. Results In total we observed femoral malrotation exceeding 15° in 33 patients (33.3%). Internal rotation was significantly more common than external rotation (31 vs. 2 patients). Intraoperative rotation up to 15° resulted in a malrotation of 10.3% (3/29 patients). When limb rotation on the traction table exceeded 20°, malrotation incidence increased to 51.0% (26/51 patients), making this fixed position a risk factor for significant femoral malrotation ( p = 0.0076). General anesthesia was also associated with a significantly higher rate of malrotation compared to spinal anesthesia ( p = 0.0154), however we did not find any statistical difference in error rates based on patient BMI or physiological femoral neck ante-version. Conclusions Our findings underscore the significant risk of femoral malrotation associated with perioperative rotations beyond 20°, emphasizing the need for precise rotational control during surgery. Excessive rotation on the traction table in an attempt to achieve better fracture alignment significantly increases the risk of femoral malrotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maléř et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: