Novel slope stability classification model enhances accuracy in diverse engineering scenarios, suggesting improved assessments.
Slope stability assessment is a critical component of engineering safety. Conventional analytical methods frequently struggle to integrate heterogeneous slope data and model intricate failure mechanisms, thereby constraining their efficacy in practical engineering scenarios. To tackle these issues, this study presents a novel slope stability classification model grounded in the Optuna-TPE-CatBoost framework. By leveraging the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) within the Optuna framework, the model adaptively optimizes CatBoost hyperparameters, thus enhancing prediction accuracy and robustness. It incorporates six key features—slope height, slope angle, unit weight, cohesion, internal friction angle, and the pore pressure ratio—to establish a comprehensive and intelligent assessment system. Utilizing a dataset of 272 slope cases, the model was trained with k-fold cross-validation and dynamic class imbalance strategies to ensure its generalizability. The optimized model achieved impressive performance metrics: an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.926, an accuracy of 0.901, a recall of 0.874, and an F1-score of 0.881, outperforming benchmark algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, and the unoptimized CatBoost. Validation via engineering case studies confirms that the model accurately evaluates slope stability across diverse scenarios and effectively captures the complex interactions between key parameters. This model offers a reliable and interpretable solution for slope stability assessment under complex failure mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: