Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced slope stability prediction in varying conditions, suggesting improved safety outcomes.
Accurate prediction of slope stability is crucial for engineering safety and disaster prevention. Traditional physical and numerical approaches often face limitations when dealing with complex conditions and require substantial resources. To address this, we propose a two-stage TrAdaBoost-based model that integrates transfer learning with machine learning algorithms (DT, RF, SVM, GBT, XGBoost) for slope stability prediction. The key advantage lies in expanding sample size by leveraging source-domain data, thus improving prediction accuracy for the target domain and overcoming the limitations of small datasets. Unlike conventional machine learning models that rely on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, our method relaxes these assumptions through dynamic weight adjustment and domain adaptation. Evaluated using MSE, MAE, and MAPE, the proposed model demonstrates consistently superior predictive performance, particularly with SVM (MSE: 0.0185, MAE: 0.1059, MAPE: 8.67%) and XGBoost (MSE: 0.0197, MAE: 0.1090, MAPE: 8.80%), outperforming traditional DT, SVM, and DNN methods. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, which not only enhances slope stability prediction under limited data but also offers potential applications in landslide forecasting and disaster risk reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: