Quasi-experimental study improves knowledge about end-stage renal disease in adolescents, indicating video education's benefits.
Background Hemodialysis is a common initial treatment for young individuals with end‐stage renal disease. Educating these patients is crucial for improving their knowledge and well‐being. Lifestyle modifications, promoted through health education, are essential for reducing hemodialysis‐related complications. Although traditional face‐to‐face education is prevalent, video‐based education offers a more convenient and cost‐effective alternative with numerous benefits. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a video‐assisted educational program on the knowledge of adolescents undergoing hemodialysis in Palestine. Methods We conducted a quasi‐experimental, pretest‐posttest intervention study with 68 adolescent patients (Aged 13–18) diagnosed with end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD). Patients were divided into two groups based on their treating hospital: an experimental group ( n = 34) received video‐based education, whereas a control group ( n = 34) received traditional face‐to‐face education. Knowledge in both groups was assessed using the validated Kidney Knowledge Questionnaire. Results A Generalized Estimating Equation analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in knowledge scores between the experimental and control groups across pretest, posttest, and follow‐up assessments ( p = 0.024). Furthermore, within both the experimental and control groups, there were statistically significant improvements in total knowledge scores from pretest to posttest and follow‐up assessments ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Implementing effective educational interventions can enhance the knowledge of individuals undergoing hemodialysis. Therefore, we recommend using video‐based instruction as a practical, easy, and engaging approach for educating hemodialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fashafsheh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: