Retrospective analysis identifies key pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia, suggesting targeted diagnostics.
Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has a complex and regionally varying pathogen distribution, and traditional testing methods may underestimate mixed infections and difficult-to-cultivate pathogens. Objectives: In this study, we analyzed the microbial characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from CAP patients using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) to provide a basis for optimizing pathogenic diagnosis and individualized treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 50 CAP patients admitted to Zibo First Hospital in 2024. Patient information collected included baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, and imaging data [Computed Tomography (CT)]. Chi-square analysis, Mann–Whitney U test, and stepwise regression were used to evaluate associations between clinical features and microbial characterization. Results: Among the 50 CAP patients, 15 (30%) were female and 35 (70%) were male. Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 15), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (n = 14), and Candida albicans (n = 14) were among the most frequently detected microorganisms. Strong collinearity (R > 0.80, P < 0.05) was observed between the following microbial pairs: Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens, enterovirus D68 and Streptococcus pneumoniae, Aspergillus versicolor and Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae and S. intermedius. Female patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of Staphylococcus aureus infection compared to male patients (U = 192.50, z = -3.15, P = 0.002). Regression analysis indicated that patient age had a significant positive effect on the diversity of microbial infections (β = 0.052, t = 3.948, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Klebsiella pneumoniae, EBV, and C. albicans may play important roles in CAP. Older CAP patients are more likely to harbor a broader spectrum of viral and fungal pathogens, highlighting the need for heightened clinical attention in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: