Meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of actinium-225 PSMA therapy for prostate cancer, suggesting significant treatment benefits.
Using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer is a promising therapeutic approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of actinium-225 (225Ac)-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) for prostate cancer. The systematic review and meta-analysis adheres to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Searches were conducted in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, CNKI, and VIP, for studies related to 225Ac-PSMA RLT for prostate cancer from inception until April 2024. The primary endpoint was the therapeutic effect as measured by post-treatment biochemical response evaluation criteria, while secondary endpoints included evaluating overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), molecular responses, etc. Results: A total of 17 studies involving 1042 patients were included. The pooled proportion of patients with PSA reduction was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80%-91%), and the pooled rate of PSA reduction >50% was 66% (95% CI: 58%-75%). The combined values for OS and PFS were 13.79 months (95% CI: 11.11-16.48 months) and 9.67 months (95% CI: 6.99-12.35 months), respectively. The molecular response rate was 71% (95% CI: 56-87%). The most common side effect of 225Ac-PSMA RLT was xerostomia, accounting for 63.5%. Anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and renal toxicity were observed in 54.3%, 30.4%, 31.8%, 32.0%, respectively. Actinium-225 -PSMA RLT is an effective and safe treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, with a low incidence of treatment-related adverse reactions. Additionally, a history of lutetium-177 (177Lu) treatment may have an impact on PSA reduction in mCRPC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: