Retrospective analysis compares intraocular pressure outcomes and surgical success in Ahmed surgery and PhacoAhmed, suggesting minimal differences.
Combined trabeculectomy–phacoemulsification is known to provoke more inflammation and yield a poorer long-term efficacy than trabeculectomy alone. This study evaluates whether a similar trend exists for Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation when performed with or without concurrent phacoemulsification. We retrospectively analyzed 51 eyes from patients who underwent either Ahmed-Alone (n = 25) or PhacoAhmed (n = 26) surgery over a 5-year period. The primary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), the use of IOP-lowering medications, and the need for further surgical intervention. Absolute success was defined as IOP reduction > 20% and IOP < 21 mmHg without medication; relative success allowed for continued pharmacologic therapy. Both groups showed a significant IOP reduction, with similar final mean IOP values (Ahmed-Alone: 14.02 ± 4.76 mmHg; PhacoAhmed: 13.89 ± 4.17 mmHg; p = 0.99) and comparable reductions in medication use (p = 0.52). Reinterventions occurred less frequently and later in the PhacoAhmed group (12% vs. 27.3%; median time: 27.1 vs. 12 months). Absolute success was not achieved in any PhacoAhmed case but occurred in 9.3% of Ahmed-Alone cases; relative success rates were similar (83.3% vs. 81.4%; p = 0.291). These findings suggest that combining phacoemulsification with Ahmed valve implantation does not significantly alter efficacy or safety profiles. Additional prospective studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vivas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: