Qualitative analysis reveals significant algorithmic biases shaping identity and self-presentation in Generation Z, highlighting cultural dynamics.
This study investigates how Instagram acts as a contemporary tool of digital colonisation, imposing Western-centric aesthetic standards and algorithmic biases that shape the self-representation and cultural visibility of Generation Z users. It builds upon the notion of a shift from colonized to decolonized to digitally recolonized, revealing how platform structures reproduce cultural hegemony. The primary aim is to explore how Generation Z negotiates, adapts to, and resists the influences of Instagram’s visual and algorithmic frameworks. The research examines the interplay of digital colonization, cultural hybridity, and identity formation in visually driven online environments. Utilizing a qualitative methodology, the study employed survey methods for 300 Gen Z participants. Thematic analysis was conducted to extract patterns related to self-presentation, algorithmic navigation, identity tension, and resistance strategies. Findings reveal a significant algorithmic preference for Western aesthetics, leading 60–70% of users to visually dilute or alter their cultural expressions to increase reach and visibility. Participants reported identity dissonance, emotional strain, and selective code-switching as coping mechanisms. However, cultural hybridity and resistance communities also emerged, demonstrating proactive reclamation of digital spaces. Instagram’s algorithmic design enforces cultural uniformity while simultaneously offering a platform for digital resistance. This tension prompts urgent calls for inclusive digital architecture and cultural literacy. The study urges platform designers and policymakers to address algorithmic bias and support authentic, diverse identity expressions among digital natives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khattak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: