Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Community-based study finds 38% anemia prevalence among Malayali tribes, highlighting socio-demographic impacts.
Introduction:anemia is a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly among Indigenous populations, because of numerous nutritional, genetic, and socio-cultural reasons. Among the Malayali tribes of Tamil Nadu, India—a Scheduled Tribe with a history of consanguineous marriage and limited access to healthcare—there is a high burden of anemia, but little has been established about the issue. Method: community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 516 respondents. Hematological profiling and Semi-structured questionnaire was utilized to collect socio-demographic indicators, morbidity history and anemia specific knowledge. Binary logistic regression analysis and Chi-square tests were utilized to study associations between demographic factors and anemia. Results: the overall prevalence of anemia in the current study was 38%, and the prevalence proportion of severe anemia was 2.3%, moderate anemia was 22.5%, and mild anemia was 13.2%.Logistic regression analysis revealed significant odds of anemia in men (aOR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.32–0.71), unmarried persons (aOR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.12–0.88), students (aOR=3.46, 95% CI: 1.23–9.76), and household members (aOR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.80). Conclusion: compared to the other Indian tribal communities, the anemia prevalence in the Malayali tribe is lower but still a public health problem for the latter and others. Hematological profiling can aid in the diagnosis of conditions in tribal, remote environments where laboratory-based diagnostic capacity could be limited. Aside from education and participant age, socioeconomic and gendered work factors seemed to have the most influence on risk factors for anemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: