This analysis contrasts simulation methods for sample size calculations in multilevel models, highlighting efficiency. It demonstrates that certain approaches reduce computational effort significantly.
Simulation-based methods are an alternative approach to sample size calculations, particularly for complex multilevel models where analytical calculations may be less straightforward. A criticism of simulation-based approaches is that they are computationally intensive, so in this paper we contrast different approaches of using the information within each simulation and sharing information across scenarios. We describe the “standard error” method (using the known effect estimate and simulations to estimate the standard error for a scenario) and show that it requires far fewer simulations than other methods. We also show that transforming power calculations onto different scales results in linear relationships with a particular family of functions of the sample size to be optimized, resulting in an easy route to sharing information across scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Browne et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: