Quasi-experimental study suggests professional development plus co-teaching enhances motor competence in students, highlighting gaps in evidence.
Introduction: Motor competence is a fundamental component of children’s physical development, influencing lifelong physical activity and overall health. Schools play a key role in fostering motor competence through physical education; however, evidence on effective instructional models remains scarce, particularly at the primary school level in Portugal. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of a professional development program for generalist primary school teachers, with and without co-teaching involving specialist physical education teachers, on students’ basic motor competencies. Methodology: This quasi-experimental study included 26 teachers and 220 students, assigned to three groups: professional development plus co-teaching, professional development only, and a control group. The intervention included a 25-hour accredited program and eight weeks of physical education co-teaching. Students’ motor competence was assessed pre- and post-intervention using the MOBAK test battery. Results were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Propensity score matching was applied to improve group comparability. Results: All groups demonstrated significant improvements in motor competence. No additional benefits were observed for the intervention groups compared to the control. Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the study timeline, delaying the start and shortening the intervention period, which may have influenced its impact. While professional development and co-teaching remain promising strategies, the non-randomized design and variability in implementation may have influenced the outcomes. Conclusions: This study provides early evidence on the implementation of co-teaching in primary physical education settings in Portugal. Future research should systematically compare co-teaching with other instructional models, incorporate process control, and include follow-up assessments to determine effective, sustainable approaches for improving motor competence and informing educational policy and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boldovskaia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: