This research reveals a low-cost diagnostic device achieving 10 2 copies/μL sensitivity for infectious disease detection, suggesting enhanced on-site testing capabilities.
Against the backdrop of accelerated globalization and aggravated climate change, the frequency and transmission risks of infectious disease outbreaks have significantly increased, posing a severe threat to public health security. Traditional pathogen diagnostic technologies, which rely on high-precision instruments, specialized personnel, and high-cost consumables, struggle to meet the demands for rapid response and on-site testing during public health emergencies. To address this challenge, this study proposes a low-cost, portable pathogen diagnostic system aimed at enhancing the capability of on-site detection for infectious diseases. The system consists of a disposable arc-shaped assay disc (DASRC) and an integrated nucleic acid rapid diagnostic device (INARDD), which integrates magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction technology and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to achieve full-process automation from sample processing to result determination. The system completes nucleic acid extraction, transfer, purification, amplification, and detection within 60 minutes, with no manual intervention required. It achieves a detection sensitivity of 10 2 copies/μL. Key components of the system can be rapidly prototyped using small-scale CNC milling machines and 3D printing technology, significantly reducing production barriers. The total system cost is approximately 560 CNY, with consumables for a single test costing only 10 CNY. The device weighs about 2 kilograms and operates without an external power source. Its compact size and operational simplicity markedly enhance the feasibility of on-site testing, offering an efficient and cost-effective solution for combating infectious disease transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: