Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Lex genetica.

Legal Regulation of Neurotechnology: Unregulated or Heavily Controlled?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MPMaria V. PosadkovaEBE. A. Brezhneva

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals issues in legal regulation of neurotechnologies, suggesting the need for frameworks at national and international levels.

Key Points

  • Fragmentary legislation in Russia regarding neurotechnology fails to encompass its broader implications and usage.
  • Countries like Chile, France, and the USA exhibit active development in specialized legal regulations concerning neurotechnologies.
  • International entities such as UNESCO and the UN focus on establishing principles to protect human rights in the context of emerging neuro-rights.
  • The specific impacts of neurotechnologies on individuals indicate an urgent need for tailored regulations to balance rights with technological advancements.

Cite This Study

Posadkova et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b5fe54b1d3bfb60eac6bhttps://doi.org/10.17803/lexgen-2025-4-2-47-62
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Privacy in the Age of Neurotechnology: Guido Girardi Lavín v. Emotiv, Inc.2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroimaging: A Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Functioning and Disorders2023 · 280 citations
  3. 3Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective2020 · 89 citations
  4. 4Summary of over Fifty Years with Brain-Computer Interfaces—A Review2021 · 289 citations