Consensus review evaluates lenvatinib and pembrolizumab efficacy in endometrial cancer, highlighting the importance of molecular diagnostics.
Endometrial cancer (EC) remains the most common gynecologic oncology disease in Russia, with a tendency toward increasing incidence and associated mortality. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease, leading to the development of a molecular classification of EC, which has enabled the implementation of personalized treatment approaches. Determining the status of microsatellite instability (MSI) and deficiency in the mismatch repair system (MMR), as well as identifying mutations in the POLE and TP53 genes, has become a key component in diagnosis and decision-making regarding therapy. The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab has demonstrated clinical efficacy in pMMR / MSS EC in the second-line setting. The Study 309 and LEAP-001 trials confirm the clinical benefit of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in patients with pMMR / MSS tumor phenotypes following prior adjuvant therapy. Expert consensus highlights the necessity of testing all patients for dMMR / MSI at initial EC diagnostics and supports the use of immunotargeted therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab already in the first-line setting for patients with pMMR / MSS phenotype and prior adjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of this review is to analyze current approaches to systemic therapy for EC, assess the clinical significance of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab therapy, and examine the role of molecular diagnostics in guiding treatment decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Нечушкина et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: