Cohort study identifies key factors affecting mortality risk in people with seizures, suggesting targeted interventions may help.
Recurrent seizure-related emergency department (ED) attendances are common and associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to identify factors associated with repeated seizure-related ED use and to develop a mortality risk score among individuals re-attending with seizures. We conducted a retrospective cohort study across two district general hospitals in South-West England, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (RCH; 2015-2018) and Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Trust (RUH; 2018-2022). Adults (≥18 years) with ≥2 seizure-related ED attendances were included. Negative binomial regression was used to examine demographic and clinical predictors of repeat attendances. A risk score based on these predictors was developed and applied to individuals presenting with a first seizure. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between risk score tertiles and all-cause mortality, adjusted for age and sex. A total of 997 patients were included (RUH n = 547; RCH n = 450). Increased frequency of seizure-related ED attendances was independently associated with higher socioeconomic deprivation (IRR 1.16, p = 0.01), homelessness (IRR 1.76, p < 0.01), and mental health conditions (IRR 1.24, p < 0.01). Intellectual disability showed a marginal association (IRR 1.12, p = 0.09). Among patients with a first seizure, those in the middle risk score tertile had significantly increased mortality risk at RUH (HR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.05-4.34). Associations were not statistically significant at RCH. Sociodemographic and clinical factors contribute to repeated seizure-related ED attendances. A simple risk score may stratify mortality risk after first seizure reattendance, warranting further validation. Targeted multidisciplinary interventions may improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary ED use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: