Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows limited PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ATM mutant melanoma, indicating complex resistance mechanisms involving slfn11.
The ataxia–telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) protein plays a crucial role in the DNA damage response, particularly in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. This study aimed to assess the impact of deleterious ATM variants on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and response to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in melanoma patients, using a cell line established from melanoma tissue of a patient carrying the c.5979_5983del germline ATM variant. Despite proven loss of heterozygosity, lack of ATM activation, and HRD, our model did not show sensitivity to PARPi. We assessed the potential contribution of the Schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11) helicase, whose expression is inversely correlated with PARPi sensitivity in other cancers, to the observed resistance. The ATM mutant cell line lacked SLFN11 expression and featured hypermethylation-mediated silencing of the SLFN11 promoter. While sensitive to the ATR inhibitor (ATRi), the addition of ATRi to PARPi was unable to overcome the resistance. Our findings suggest that ATM mutational status and HRD alone do not adequately account for variations in sensitivity to PARPi in our model. A comprehensive approach is essential for optimizing the exploitation of DNA repair defects and ultimately improving clinical outcomes for melanoma patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allavena et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: