This investigation reveals enhanced catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts in hydroisomerization of palm oil, suggesting significant implications for biojet fuel efficiency.
This study investigated the catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts supported on micromesoporous composites derived from the incorporation of SBA-15 with USY-(SBA-15-xUSY) or Hbeta-(SBA-15-xHbeta) zeolites (where x is wt percentage of zeolite fraction in the composite) for palm oil hydroisomerization to produce biojet fuel range. The hydroisomerization was conducted in a fixed-bed reactor under 25 bar of H2 pressure at 40 mL/min, 425 °C, 0.1 mL/min palm oil feed rate, and 5 g of catalyst. It was observed that the support materials significantly influenced catalytic activity and product selectivity. In the case of zeolite supports, the Ni-based catalysts supported by USY zeolite showed the highest liquid product yield (54.3 wt %) and iso-to-normal (i-/n-) alkane ratio of 1.43, whereas those supported on Hbeta zeolite provide the lower yield of liquid biofuel with high gasoline fraction (25.5%) and i-/n-alkane ratio of 2.58. The micromesoporous composite supports enhanced specific surface area and pore size to decrease the mass transfer limitation, resulting in better catalytic performance. The Ni/SBA-15-50USY and Ni/SBA-15-50Hbeta catalysts exhibited the highest selectivity to biojet fuel-range hydrocarbons, reaching 78.8 and 76.7 wt %, respectively. Moreover, the Ni/SBA-15-xHbeta catalyst promoted significantly higher selectivity to the iso-alkanes fraction in the obtained liquid biofuels than Ni/SBA-15-xUSY catalysts. The maximum i-/n-alkanes ratio at 3.45 was achieved for the system using Ni/SBA-15-30Hbeta catalyst, demonstrating the beneficial role of SBA-15 in boosting diffusion and catalytic efficiency. This result suggested that the integration of BEA zeolite crystals into the mesoporous SBA-15 structure allowed the closer proximity between the Ni-metal and Brønsted acid sites to optimize the hydrocracking efficiency for biojet fuel production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panarmasar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: