Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows elevated NT-IGFBP-4 levels predict coronary heart disease risk and lesion complexity, highlighting advanced assessment methods.
Background We aimed to explore the value of serum N-terminal insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (NT-IGFBP-4) in the non-invasive risk stratification of coronary heart disease and its predictive efficiency for the complexity of coronary artery lesions [assessed by Synergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) and SYNTAX II scores]. Methods Subjects (180 in total) were recruited from patients treated between September 2023 and September 2024. Serum NT-IGFBP-4 level was measured. SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores were assessed. Results The serum NT-IGFBP-4 level, SYNTAX score, and SYNTAX II score of the high-risk group were significantly higher than those of medium- and low-risk groups ( p <0.001). The patients with more affected vessels had higher NT-IGFBP-4 levels. Univariate analysis of variance showed that NT-IGFBP-4 level was significantly different among the three risk groups (F=18.991, p <0.001), with a linear trend ( p <0.001). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that NT-IGFBP-4 level was positively correlated with the risk stratification (r=0.420, p <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NT-IGFBP-4 level, SYNTAX score, and three-vessel disease were independent predictors of coronary artery lesions ( p <0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curves of NT-IGFBP-4, SYNTAX score, and three-vessel disease were all >0.700. Conclusions Serum NT-IGFBP-4 reflects the pathophysiological state of coronary heart disease when combined with the SYNTAX II scoring system. It shows a significant positive correlation with the risk of coronary heart disease and can independently predict this risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: