Discussion on therapeutic endings and clinical flexibility in psychoanalysis, suggesting new approaches.
I consider the place of termination in contemporary psychoanalytic practice. A more flexible approach to therapeutic endings represents one dimension of a broader paradigm shift away from rule-boundedness and toward clinical flexibility. In any event, final, less-than-final, and absent goodbyes have always been part of psychoanalytic reality despite the power of our termination ideal. I first describe the broader move toward flexibility within the field and then address its complex implications for psychoanalytic endings. In that context, I explore the varied ways in which we don't always end treatment relationships. The implications of not entirely ending a treatment are also addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joyce Slochower (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: