Cross-sectional analysis shows blood cell count-derived markers outperform protein-based markers for diabetic peripheral neuropathy diagnostics.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a prevalent and disabling complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus, contributing to poor quality of life and increased healthcare burden. Chronic low-grade inflammation has been proposed as a key contributor to the pathogenesis of DPN. While various inflammatory markers have been studied, their diagnostic utility remains unclear, particularly when comparing protein-based markers and blood cell count-derived ratios. This study aimed to investigate whether blood cell count-based inflammatory markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are more strongly associated with DPN compared to protein-based markers, including interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). In this cross-sectional study, 137 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited. DPN was defined as a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score ≥2. All participants underwent physical examinations, questionnaire assessments, and laboratory evaluation of inflammatory markers. NLR was significantly elevated in the DPN group compared to controls (P < 0.05), while IL-1Ra and hsCRP levels showed no significant differences. Participants in the highest NLR tertile exhibited a higher DPN prevalence (19.0%) than those in the lowest tertile (8.8%). Multivariate linear regression identified NLR and HbA1c as independent predictors of MNSI scores. Our findings demonstrate that the NLR, an inflammation-related marker derived from peripheral blood cell counts, is significantly associated with DPN, whereas protein-based markers did not demonstrate clear associations. These findings suggest that NLR may serve as a simple, cost-effective biomarker for identifying patients at risk for DPN. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to clarify causal relationships and evaluate its prognostic value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: