Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comprehensive analyses reveal new graph measures relate to cognitive function, suggesting enhanced prediction models.
In this work, we propose a new class of graph measures for weighted connectivity information in the human brain based on node relative strengths: relative strength variability (RSV), measuring susceptibility to targeted attacks, and hierarchical RSV (hRSV), a first weighted statistical complexity measure for networks. Using six different network weights for structural connectomes from the UK Biobank, we conduct comprehensive analyses to explore relationships between the RSV and hRSV, and (i) other known network measures, (ii) general cognitive function (‘’). Both measures exhibit low correlations with other graph measures across all connectivity weightings indicating that they capture new information of the brain connectome. We found higher was associated with lower RSV and lower hRSV. That is, higher was associated with higher resistance to targeted attack and lower statistical complexity. Moreover, the proposed measures had consistently stronger associations with than other widely used graph measures including clustering coefficient and global efficiency and were incrementally significant for predicting above other measures for five of the six network weights. Overall, we present a new class of weighted network measures based on variations of relative node strengths which significantly improved prediction of general cognition from traditional weighted structural connectomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: