Survey reveals higher gastrointestinal symptom scores in elite equestrian athletes, suggesting health implications.
Equestrian sports present a unique challenge to the rider's gastrointestinal (GI) tract and health as they meet nutritional requirements for performance, execute riding discipline-specific skills, and coordinate their hip and abdominal movements with their equine movement pattern. Additional gastrointestinal challenges may result from the known gut-brain axis, as previous research reports a high rate of anxiety in equestrian athletes. A survey was administered to assess the prevalence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in recreational and elite equestrian athletes across a range of disciplines. Participants reported the prevalence of 12 symptoms on a 0–10 point scale and stool consistency using a modified validated questionnaire. Total symptom score, symptom perception, and symptom region (Upper GI tract, Lower GI tract, and Other) were assessed. A subset of elite riders repeated the questionnaire post-competition. Elite riders had a higher average total GI symptom score but did not differ significantly from the recreational sample (W = 438.50; p = 0.13; rB = 0.19; Small). There were no regional symptom differences between groups. The prevalence of all abnormal stool consistencies was higher in the elite sample compared to the recreational sample. Five elite athletes (25%) reported blood in the stool. Symptoms are not correlated with nor predicted by rider age or number of competitions performed per year (all p > 0.05; R2 = 0.10–0.59). Symptoms were not significantly different in competition. The majority of equestrians present with some GI symptoms, with a small proportion of elite and recreational riders showing symptoms that impair exercise performance. The questionnaire provides a useful starting point for athletes, coaches, and support personnel to understand the prevalence and severity of symptoms in equestrians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Best et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: