What type of study is this?

This is a Normative study (also classified as: Comparative Law).

September 10, 2025Jurist-DictionOpen Access

History and Application of Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine: A Comparison Study between the United Kingdom and Indonesia

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil allows liability to reach a company's controllers, affirming its importance in corporate law.
UK legal precedents such as the Rossendale case illustrate a nuanced approach, emphasizing that not every case requires the doctrine.
Indonesian law addresses the doctrine implicitly without significant landmark cases, indicating a need for further clarity and development.
The UK maintains strong adherence to limited liability, while Indonesia's lack of balance may hinder effective application of the doctrine.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This analysis compares the application of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine in the UK and Indonesia, highlighting differences in legal interpretations and implications.

Cite This Study

Muhammad Aqil Kamaluddin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bb5b54b1d3bfb60ecdfe https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v8i2.71569

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis compares the application of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine in the UK and Indonesia, highlighting differences in legal interpretations and implications.

History and Application of Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine: A Comparison Study between the United Kingdom and Indonesia

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

History and Application of Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine: A Comparison Study between the United Kingdom and Indonesia

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider