Novel dual-stream approach improves image forgery detection accuracy, indicating advances in explainability and feature discrimination.
Image forgery detection aims to identify tampered content and localise manipulated regions within images. With the rise of advanced editing tools, forgeries pose serious challenges across media, law and scientific domains. Existing CNN‐based models struggle to detect subtle manipulations that mimic natural image patterns. To address this challenge, we propose a dual‐stream contrastive learning network (DSCL‐Net) that jointly exploits spatial (pixel‐level) and frequency (noise‐level) cues. The architecture employs two ResNet‐50 encoders: one processes the red–green–blue (RGB) image to capture semantic context, whereas the other processes a spatial rich model (SRM) filtered version to extract high‐frequency forensic traces. A multi‐scale attention fusion module enhances manipulation‐sensitive features. The network includes three heads: a classification head for image‐level prediction, a segmentation head for pixel‐wise localisation, and a contrastive projection head to improve feature discrimination. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed model on two benchmark datasets. The proposed DSCL‐Net surpasses previous state‐of‐the‐art methods by achieving an image‐level accuracy of 97.9% on the CASIA and 89.8% on IMD2020. At the pixel level, it attains an F 1‐score of 92.7% and an AUC of 91.2% on CASIA, and an F 1‐score of 86.6% with an AUC of 90.1% on IMD2020. Furthermore, LIME and SHAP have been employed to provide explainability at individual image level to comprehend the alignment of the predicted mask with the ground truth mask. The developed approach contributes to the development of safe technology for dealing with misinformation and fake news.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munawar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: