Findings reveal flavonoid biosynthesis pathways and gene regulation in Physalis, indicating stress adaptation mechanisms.
As plants with medicinal and edible properties, the response mechanism to low temperature (LT) stress of plants in the genus Physalis remains unclear. To explore the molecular mechanisms in Physalis grisea under LT, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and physiological analyses were carried out. LT induced the accumulation of malondialdehyde and proline, and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, as evidenced by deeper NBT and DAB staining. Differentially upregulated genes were enriched in pathways including secondary metabolism and transcription factor regulation. The black module enriched in flavonoid biosynthesis and phenylalanine metabolism was further screened out through weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA). The co‐expression network revealed the relationships of key structural genes related to flavonoid synthesis and transcription factors (TFs). To elucidate the association between treatment duration and flavonoid metabolism, total flavonoid content was measured and found to exhibit a significant positive correlation with treatment time. Based on the 45 differentially accumulated flavonoid metabolites (DAFMs) identified using High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography, four kinds of shared DAFMs (luteolin, quercetin, apigenin, and dihydrokaempferol) exhibited continuous increases throughout the treatment period. Based on the metabolic pathway map and correlation network analysis of flavonoid structural genes and DAFMs, 12 structural genes were found to be involved in regulating the biosynthesis of these DAFMs. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR verified the expression patterns of structural genes and potential upstream TFs, which highlight the critical regulatory role of flavonoids in Physalis grisea LT adaptation. This study established a fundamental framework for understanding the mechanism of LT response and flavonoid biosynthesis in Physalis .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yue et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: