Comparison of osseodensification and osteotome methods highlights similar perforation rates in maxillary sinus lifts.
Objective: This study aims to compare the incidence of sinus membrane perforation between osseodensification and osteotome crestal sinus lift techniques when 5 mm of residual bone is present beneath the sinus floor. Additionally, it seeks to identify when the perforation most commonly occurs—during instrumentation, bone grafting, or implant insertion. METHODS: A split-mouth design using 20 sinuses from 10 fresh human cadaver heads were employed. One side underwent a bone-added osteotome crestal sinus lift, while the other side received an osseodensification lift. Membrane perforation was recorded through video analysis. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sinus membrane perforation occurred in 40% of the osteotome group and 50% of the osseodensification group, with no significant difference between the two (p=0.564). Most perforations occurred during implant placement (20% in the control group and 40% in the test group), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.480). Perforations during drilling were observed in 10% of test sinuses and 20% of the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.317). No perforations occurred during bone graft placement. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the incidence of membrane perforation between the osseodensification and osteotome groups. However, a higher incidence during implant placement suggests potential limitations in the predictability of crestal sinus lift procedures with 5 mm of residual bone. Further research is needed to optimize outcomes and predictability in crestal sinus lift procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alqadoumi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: