Descriptive cross-sectional study compares in-hospital outcomes of thrombolysed STEMI patients, indicating better results than late presenters.
Background: The ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a severe cardiac emergency with a significant dependence on early treatment for outcomes. Thrombolysis plays a central role in circumstances where a percutaneous coronary intervention facility is not accessible. Late presentation more frequently makes a patient a non-candidate for early thrombolysis, further compromising prognosis. Objective: To determine and compare the in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who received thrombolysis versus those who presented late and were not thrombolysed. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: Conducted from October 2024 to March 2025 in the Department of Cardiology, Rehman Medical Institute Peshawar. Methodology: A total of 224 patients with STEMI were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A (thrombolysed within 12 hours) and Group B (late presenters, not thrombolysed). Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, ECG criteria, and elevated troponin levels. In-hospital outcomes including mortality, left ventricular failure, mitral regurgitation, and ventricular septal rupture were documented. Results: Out of 224 patients, 122 received thrombolysis within 12 hours (thrombolysed group) and 102 presented late without thrombolysis (late presenters). The thrombolysed group had significantly lower mortality (9.8% vs. 25.5%; p=0.002), left ventricular failure (27.9% vs. 41.2%; p=0.036), ventricular septal rupture (4.9% vs. 13.7%; p=0.021), and mitral regurgitation (24.6% vs. 45.1%; p=0.001) compared to late presenters. Conclusion: Early thrombolysis in STEMI patients significantly improves in-hospital outcomes, emphasizing the importance of reducing delays in presentation and intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: