Gene sequencing identifies mutations affecting glycosyltransferase stability in Aw26 blood group, suggesting implications for blood compatibility.
To analyze the sequencing results, protein structure model, and impact of mutations on the dynamic stability of glycosyltransferase (GTA) in a case with Aw26 blood group subtype. ABO phenotype was determined by serological testing (anti-A, anti-B, anti-H, and reverse typing). Potential variant of the ABO gene was identified by Sanger sequencing, and the haploid sequence of the variant site was analyzed by TOPOT-A cloning. Molecular models of the GTA was generated by PyMol, and 100-ns molecular dynamics (MD) was simulated with GROMACS software to assess the conformational stability using root mean square deviation (RMSD), radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), hydrogen bonding, and binding free energy. Serological assays confirmed the proband as an Aw subtype, whose genotype was identified as ABO*Aw.26/ABO*O.01.02 with variants including p.Pro156Leu, p.Arg176His and p.Pro354ArgfsTer23. Haploid sequencing validated the results of direct sequencing. Molecular modeling showed that the p.Arg176His variant could reduce water-mediated hydrogen bonds from six (wild-type) to one (variant). MD simulation revealed the wild type system could achieve equilibrium within 10 ns (mean RMSD ≈ 0.30 nm), whilst the mutant system required 50 ns to equilibrate and exhibited greater fluctuation (mean RMSD ≈ 0.40 nm). Root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) analysis confirmed significantly increased flexibility in the mutant's N-terminal loop (residues 63-76). The mutant Rg displayed an expansion-contraction transition within 0 ~ 40 ns, and its SASA value has increased. The number of hydrogen bonds and binding energy of the mutant had decreased (wild-type: 5 to 8, binding energy: -11.53 kcal/mol; mutant: 2 to 5, binding energy:-8.52 kcal/mol). An Aw26 subtype was identified. The p.Arg176His and p.Pro354Argfs*23p variants could synergistically compromise the structural stability of GTA and its substrate binding capacity by disrupting the hydrogen-bond network, increasing local flexibility, and reducing the overall conformational stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: