Case-control study compares surgical outcomes for macular holes in high myopia and non-high myopia, indicating better closure rates with ILM flap surgery.
Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery in high myopia (HM) versus non-HM eyes. Patient and Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent MH repair between 2018 and 2022. HM was defined by axial length (AL) ≥ 26 mm. MH size, macular curvature and foveoschisis were graded. Surgical technique was divided into internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel or flap. Post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical outcomes including hole closure, restoration of outer retinal layers, presence of foveal gliosis or foveal detachment were assessed at post-operative one, three, six and twelve months. Results: Thirty-four HM eyes were matched 1:1 to 34 out of 201 non-HM eyes with using gender, age, MH size and concurrent phacoemulsification as covariates. Mean AL in the HM group was 28.46 ± 2.01 mm, ranging from 26.03 to 32.83 mm. MH size was 366± 183 μm and 386± 199 μm in HM and non-HM groups (p=0.667). BCVA and restoration of outer retinal layers were comparable between groups at all time points. Initial hole closure rate was comparable, with 29 (85.3%) in HM group vs 30 (88.2%) in non-HM eyes, p=0.720. One eye in the HM group re-opened 10 months post-operatively. Proportion of eyes with non-closure was higher in those who underwent ILM peel vs flap [7/34 (20.5%) vs 0/34 (0%), p=0.022]. Smaller MH was associated with better closure rate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99– 1.00). AL and macular curvature were not associated with hole closure (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72– 1.15; OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99– 1.02 respectively). Larger MH was associated with poorer final BCVA (β=0.010, 95% CI 0.007– 0.014). Conclusion: Anatomical success was comparable between HM and non-HM eyes. Higher surgical success was associated with smaller MH size and ILM flap, but not influenced by AL, macular curvature or foveoschisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: