This review highlights research gaps in contrast-enhanced mammography, focusing on safety, applications, and AI integration.
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a promising breast imaging technique offering morphological and functional information through the use of dual-energy mammography and intravenous iodinated contrast agents. Despite increasing clinical use, its implementation remains heterogeneous, and several technical and clinical questions stay unanswered. This review aims to highlight the major research gaps related to CEM technique, safety, interpretation, and clinical applications. We examined key areas requiring standardization, including acquisition protocols, contrast agent dosing, and interpretation of background parenchymal enhancement. Safety concerns regarding radiation exposure and contrast media reactions were addressed, along with a comparison between CEM and breast MRI in terms of diagnostic performance. New applications such as CEM-guided biopsies and supplemental screening in high-risk women were critically reviewed and the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics into CEM interpretation was also considered and discussed. Finally, we briefly summarized the main ongoing multicenter trials investigating the clinical utility and implementation of CEM across different healthcare settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pediconi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: