This retrospective survey examined endoparasite rates in feline samples, indicating diverse detection methods.
This retrospective study examined the occurrence of endoparasites in feline faecal samples in a German diagnostic laboratory between January 2019 and December 2019. Different methods for endoparasite detection were performed: 6,425 samples by flotation method as well as sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin concentration (SAFC) technique, 721 samples by Baermann-Wetzel migration technique, 3,233 samples by a Giardia coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 346 samples by a Cryptosporidium coproantigen ELISA, 1,007 samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Giardia duodenalis, and 672 samples by PCR testing for Cryptosporidium spp. A total of 8.5% of the samples were positive for parasites in the microscopic examination using the flotation method and SAFC technique in combination: Toxocara cati (3.8%), Cystoisospora spp. (2.3%), Giardia duodenalis (1.9%), Ancylostomatidae (0.3%), lungworm larvae (0.3%), Toxoplasma gondii/Hammondia hammondi (0.2%), Taeniidae (0.2%), Capillaria spp. (0.2%), Toxascaris leonina (0.08%), Sarcocystis spp. (0.06%) and Dipylidium caninum (0.02%). The detection rate of lungworm larvae by the Baermann-Wetzel migration technique was 4.7%. Giardia duodenalis was detected by ELISA in 8.1% of the samples and by PCR in 7.9%. Detection rates for Cryptosporidium spp. were 1.7% by ELISA and 2.5% by PCR. Cats in the first year of life were more frequently infected with parasites than older animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csokai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: