Review outlines current neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies in triple-negative breast cancer, suggesting a need for personalized systemic therapies to improve outcomes.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, with a higher risk of recurrence in the early-stage setting compared to other subtypes. While TNBC is defined as breast cancer that lacks estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression and is without human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, it is increasingly recognized as a very heterogeneous disease. Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), with or without immunotherapy (depending on the clinical stage), has significantly improved clinical outcomes in early-stage TNBC (particularly in Stage II and III disease). Use of NAC offers the opportunity to de-escalate surgical treatment and evaluate treatment response, allowing for improved prognostication and further tailoring of post-operative systemic therapy. However, there continues to be a need for the personalization of systemic therapy strategies according to recurrence risk. More effective systemic therapies are still needed for patients who have poor response to NAC. Conversely, there remains a need for the identification of appropriate candidates for systemic therapy de-escalation, particularly given the potentially life-altering toxicities of current chemo-immunotherapy strategies. In this review the authors outline the current neoadjuvant paradigm for early-stage TNBC and emerging therapeutic strategies in this challenging disease state, along with questions that remain unanswered in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Premji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: