Descriptive qualitative analysis reveals how educational strategies can combat radicalism in students.
Modified and enriched learning materials are essential tools that provide students with both theoretical understanding and practical implementation skills. Therefore, students' learning can be improved by increasing understanding and the ability to analyze the subject. The results of this study showed good understanding was obtained from intensive analysis, structured with systematic thinking and procedure. In addition, this study provided efforts to build students' analytical skills with the aim of examining better learning strategies, models, and approaches to counteract radicalism. To achieve this objective, critical and analytical narratives were initiated in counteracting radicalism in students. In this context, radical thinking is very dangerous because it provokes crimes and terrorism. A descriptive qualitative method was used with a digital literacy approach and citizenship values. The urgency of digital literacy is warding off radicalism in the millennial generation, specifically Industrial Revolution 4.0, using content analysis techniques. This study investigated the influence of students analysis on each Islamic religious subject related to radicalism. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted to obtain accurate data, and teachers strategies used in teaching Islamic materials were analyzed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halidin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: