This article demonstrates strategies for promoting wellness and mental health in higher education, highlighting the need for institutional investment.
Current literature primarily focuses on the roles of occupational burnout and the negative impacts of family-work conflict on job satisfaction. Even though there is a growing emphasis on wellness, faculty professional development, inclusive community, mental health, and social justice for students, academic staff, and non-teaching staff, the outcome of the 2022 to 2023 Healthy Minds Network on Employees in Higher Education survey indicates that about 81% of faculty want their institution to invest more resources to support faculty and staff mental health and wellbeing. The current government and organizations’ emphasis on promoting wellness for a flourishing family-work relationship uniquely positions University administrators to provide valuable programs for faculty, students, and non-teaching staff. Therefore, this article used a socioecological model to demonstrate the practical strategies on how university administrators can promote wellness for a flourishing family-work relationship. Applying the Socio-ecological model of Mental health and Well-being allows university administrators to consider workplace burnout from a holistic perspective rather than using limited institutional policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obisike et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: