Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals a 16.81% procurement failure rate and presents solutions through lean six sigma, indicating significant potential for improvements.
X, a public railway transportation company, is experiencing challenges in its procurement process, including frequent delays and failures. To support timely project execution and optimal budget utilization, this study applies the Lean Six Sigma methodology through the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) framework to analyze inefficiencies and propose improvements. The Define phase identifies key procurement issues and customer expectations; the Measure phase calculates the current sigma level (3.33) and highlights problem patterns; the Analyze phase explores root causes using fishbone diagrams and 5 Whys; the Improve phase presents 13 actionable recommendations; and the Control phase outlines a plan to sustain improvements. The primary issue identified is a 16.81% procurement failure rate, mainly due to bids exceeding the Owner’s Estimate and the absence of qualified vendors. Cost-benefit analysis confirms the feasibility of improvements, showing a Net Present Value (NPV) of IDR 770,512,859, a Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) of 1.557, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 108%, and a Payback Period of 1 year. These findings support the implementation of targeted process enhancements to improve procurement performance at PT. X.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfatiani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: